Velázquez, Van Hollen Urge Regulators to Crack Down on Bank Executive Pay Schemes that Incentivize Risk

WASHINGTON – Today, U.S. Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) and Congresswoman Nydia Velázquez (D-N.Y.) urged financial regulators to finalize actions to prohibit compensation arrangements for executives of large financial institutions that encourage reckless decision-making. This long over-due rulemaking required by Section 956 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (Dodd-Frank) and mandated for completion by April 2011, is intended to prevent incentive-based executive pay structures that promote steep risk-taking and may result in harm to consumers and the American economy.

In their letter to Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, Federal Reserve Vice Chairman for Supervision Michael Barr, Securities and Exchange Commission Chairman Gary Gensler, and National Credit Union Administration Chairman Todd Harper, the lawmakers press the regulators to comply with the law and move forward expeditiously with finalization, following the recently proposed rules from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), Office of Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), and the Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) on executive compensation.

“Almost fourteen years ago, Congress instructed six agencies to issue rules prohibiting compensation arrangements that encourage inappropriate risk-taking at covered financial institutions,” the lawmakers began. “But the Federal Reserve, the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the National Credit Union Administration have not voted to move forward with this rule.”

This letter comes just over a year after Senator Van Hollen and Congresswoman Velázquez wrote to regulators on the same matter in the wake of the collapse of Silicon Valley Bank – which the Federal Reserve concluded was spurred in part by incentive-based compensation. In today’s letter, they wrote, “In the Spring of 2023, the failures of Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and other regional banks prompted renewed attention to the relation between compensation structures and misguided, even reckless decision-making by bankers. On April 26, 2023, we wrote to you detailing how SVB’s compensation structure encouraged recklessness. We emphasized the importance of completing this rule.

“Subsequently, the Federal Reserve itself issued a report describing the factors that led to the demise of SVB. The report concluded that ‘[t]he incentive compensation arrangements and practices at SVBFG encouraged excessive risk taking to maximize short-term financial metrics’ and that ‘[s]tronger or more specific supervisory guidance or rules on incentive compensation … may have mitigated these risks.’ The 91-page report cites ‘compensation’ 63 times,” the lawmakers continued.

“April 2024 marked an unlucky 13 years since Congress mandated completion. We must not tolerate another preventable regional bank failure, another fake account scandal, another bank bribery of a foreign government because the regulators have failed to finalize statutorily mandated reform. And so we say, and not for the first time, that it is time for your agencies to finalize the Section 956 rulemaking,” they concluded.

Senator Van Hollen and Congresswoman Velázquez also pointed to their April 2023 letter for potential guardrails around bank executive pay that should be a part of these agencies’ rules. Those guardrails include a ban on stock options and hedging as well as a lengthy deferral period for incentive compensation.

Full text of the letter is below and here.

###